Advanced searches left 3/3
Search only database of 12 mil and more summaries


Summarized by PlexPage
Last Updated: 02 July 2021

* If you want to update the article please login/register

General | Latest Info

Has Lead been updated to reflect new content added by your peer? Yes, Do lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes Do Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes Do Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes, is lead concise or is IT overly detail? Concise This was very well-write Lead. It covers all of the information I would expect in a book article. I notice that there is mention of themes. IT's mentioned again in the background, which is perfect, but I also think these themes should be discussed in the context of the plot. I assume elaboration on this would go in the analysis section, which is not yet write. My only other recommendation is that you add an image of the book cover, if possible. Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Yes, overall, content is good. However, there are a few issues. The first thing I noticed was how much bigger the Part II section was than Part I. I understand that section was probably longer, but I think IT could been a bit more concise. Not every detail has to be include. Another concern is the quote in the background section. Wikipedia guidelines specifically state that quotations should be kept to a very minimum. You do not need a block of text in the middle of that section; IT can easily be summarized in one or two sentences. I would also love to see a bit more on translator, if possible, since this article is about the English version of text. Can you find any sources about the translating process of this book? Are there any claims that appear heavily bias toward particular position? No Do content add attempt to persuade readers in favor of one position or away from another? No, there is not really any side to take here. The tone is professional and neutral. Great job! Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes are sources thorough-I. E Do they reflect available literature on topic? Yes-sort of. See evaluation. Good number of sources, all reliable. However, you could use some variety. Almost every source is review. Try to see if you can fit in some more objective sources or, better yet, more interviews / direct quotes from authors or translator. Is content added well-write-I. E Is IT concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, do content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No Is content add well-organize-I. E broken down into sections that reflect major points of the topic? Yes, great job! Include title, author, translator, language, publisher, and date. Has content add improved the overall quality of the article-I. E Is article more complete? Yes, what are strengths of content add?

* Please keep in mind that all text is machine-generated, we do not bear any responsibility, and you should always get advice from professionals before taking any actions.

* Please keep in mind that all text is machine-generated, we do not bear any responsibility, and you should always get advice from professionals before taking any actions

logo is an Online Knowledge, where all the summaries are written by a machine. We aim to collect all the knowledge the World Wide Web has to offer.

Nvidia inception logo

© All rights reserved
2022 made by Algoritmi Vision Inc.

If you believe that any of the summaries on our website lead to misinformation, don't hesitate to contact us. We will immediately review it and remove the summaries if necessary.

If your domain is listed as one of the sources on any summary, you can consider participating in the "Online Knowledge" program, if you want to proceed, please follow these instructions to apply.
However, if you still want us to remove all links leading to your domain from and never use your website as a source, please follow these instructions.